There are many conservation areas in Southend-on-Sea, five in
Milton ward alone. We have a rich array of heritage assets, evident
in the fact the borough ranks seventh in the heritage assets index
out of 325 local authorities.
We get warm words from the ruling administration locally as
regards to conservation, but this is not matched by action. Their
commitment is best illustrated by missed working party meetings, and
at one point over a year when the Conservation Working Party did not
meet.
I do not doubt that many in the Council (both members and
officers) care deeply that our heritage assets are preserved and
enhanced, but I do not get a sense of any urgency in this. A rather
limp approach to conservation threatens what we have.
The Conservative administration is still intent, for example, on
building a monstrous museum in the cliffs at Westcliff-on-Sea not
only spoiling a heritage asset, but also spoiling a beautiful green
space. So much for doing something for the environment. (I still
favour putting the museum in the High Street, maybe in the old BHS
building).
I think we should be more gungho in our defence of the heritage
assets that we have inherited. These assets (buildings, parks, etc)
should not just have all the protection we can provide, we should
also be promoting the town in this respect. Places like Bath and
Brighton used their inheritance to sell the attractions of their
towns.
We should also push to attract funding, we are a long way from
getting anywhere the amount of money that other local authorities
get.
Looking after our heritage does not mean ‘no change’. It does
mean retaining the good, and ensuring all new developments are
designed sympathetically as regards to its neighbours.
Let’s keep Southend beautiful, and let’s ensure that
generations to come are not robbed by poor decisions taken today.
Thursday, 11 October 2018
Wednesday, 10 October 2018
On the plans for Maple ward at Rochford Hospital
I have received several representations regarding proposals for Maple ward, and below is an example. I made made some minor changes to protect the identity of the author.
Dear Councillor Julian Ware-Lane,
I am writing to you to ask for your support in a matter I feel very passionately about.
Mental health nurses work at the local dementia assessment ward (Maple Ward) at Rochford Hospital. They nurse patients who are initially admitted to us under Section 2/3 of the mental health act, often due to being impossible to manage in the community. They provide assessment and treatment to patients who can no longer be cared for safely at home or in a care home, often due to their physical aggression.
Unfortunately, we have just been informed of the news that the ward is under consultation. With plans to close the existing ward at Rochford hospital. This would mean that the next nearest dementia assessment unit is in Thurrock. I am greatly concerned about how ethical this is to local residents who suffer from dementia and their relatives.
Residents in the local area would have to travel over 25 miles to access a dementia ward. Something which is a challenge and a financial burden for our elderly community. How can we expect relatives of dementia patients to travel all the way to Thurrock to visit their loved ones? Thurrock hospital offers no form of transport links with our local area (Southend/Rochford/Benfleet). The cost of a taxi is £55.00 for one way from Rochford to Thurrock hospital (£110 for a return).
Unlike physical health hospitals, admission to a dementia assessment unit is not a short stay. Patients will often stay for a minimum of 6-8 weeks, but as they pose such challenging behaviour, they often stay much longer as they cannot be placed in care homes and require a stay of several months.
Therefore, relatives will not only be doing the trip to Thurrock for a few days/weeks, they would have to pay for the travel for months upon months. How can we expect local pensioners in our area to afford this?
The expectation people should travel into another area for dementia care is astonishing, it is a backward step, and is certainly not beneficial to our local community.
Please can I ask for any support from you in this matter? We care so much about Maple ward and the elderly people in our community who are affected by dementia. We strongly oppose any plans to remove the dementia assessment unit from Rochford Hospital.
Yours sincerely
Dear Councillor Julian Ware-Lane,
I am writing to you to ask for your support in a matter I feel very passionately about.
Mental health nurses work at the local dementia assessment ward (Maple Ward) at Rochford Hospital. They nurse patients who are initially admitted to us under Section 2/3 of the mental health act, often due to being impossible to manage in the community. They provide assessment and treatment to patients who can no longer be cared for safely at home or in a care home, often due to their physical aggression.
Unfortunately, we have just been informed of the news that the ward is under consultation. With plans to close the existing ward at Rochford hospital. This would mean that the next nearest dementia assessment unit is in Thurrock. I am greatly concerned about how ethical this is to local residents who suffer from dementia and their relatives.
Residents in the local area would have to travel over 25 miles to access a dementia ward. Something which is a challenge and a financial burden for our elderly community. How can we expect relatives of dementia patients to travel all the way to Thurrock to visit their loved ones? Thurrock hospital offers no form of transport links with our local area (Southend/Rochford/Benfleet). The cost of a taxi is £55.00 for one way from Rochford to Thurrock hospital (£110 for a return).
Unlike physical health hospitals, admission to a dementia assessment unit is not a short stay. Patients will often stay for a minimum of 6-8 weeks, but as they pose such challenging behaviour, they often stay much longer as they cannot be placed in care homes and require a stay of several months.
Therefore, relatives will not only be doing the trip to Thurrock for a few days/weeks, they would have to pay for the travel for months upon months. How can we expect local pensioners in our area to afford this?
The expectation people should travel into another area for dementia care is astonishing, it is a backward step, and is certainly not beneficial to our local community.
Please can I ask for any support from you in this matter? We care so much about Maple ward and the elderly people in our community who are affected by dementia. We strongly oppose any plans to remove the dementia assessment unit from Rochford Hospital.
Yours sincerely
Monday, 8 October 2018
A Final Act for the benefit of the people of Southend from beyond the grave!
This is written by my friend and colleague, Stephen George.
Until the last few months of his terminal illness, my late father
Colin George chaired the Southend Hospital Charitable Foundation, a
committee comprised of local people that helped to raise millions of
pounds for the provision of amongst other things specialist equipment
for the Stroke Unit enabling it to become one of the best in this
country.
As a politician he knew that in
reality there are actually very few times when people elected to
positions of power locally are privileged enough to wield that power in
order to shape, influence and even make a real decision that makes a
real difference. This is one of those times!
![]() |
| Stephen George |
Ironically
I was in Hadleigh on Saturday 6th October to discuss with my mother and
sister the disposal of my fathers ashes, who having given his body for
medical research was only recently cremated as the medical researchers
keep donated bodies for three years before releasing the remains to
their families. Afterwards I had to go to Basildon as my son had been
invited to a birthday party unfortunately we arrived as it finished
having been delayed by the accident at the Rayleigh Weir that occurred
earlier in the morning and there was traffic chaos on the A127 and A13
as people sought alternative routes from Southend to Basildon.
Then
think of the 'golden hour', the period of time between the occurrence
of a stroke and the provision of treatment needed in order for there to
be a favourable patient outcome. Think of a resident living in the
Garrison site in Shoebury and even with a blue light I suspect any
ambulance would have struggled to make it from Shoebury to Basildon in
under an hour.
My fathers life was saved at an
early age by the predecessor of the NHS and as a result remained a firm
believer in the NHS. He was a man who devoted his life to the town and
people of Southend as a Councillor, County Councillor, Magistrate,
General Secretary of the local Citizens Advice Bureau for over 30 years,
Chair of Estuary Housing Association and finally as Chair of Southend
Hospital's Charitable Foundation.
I know my
father would be favour of improved NHS services, however he would not be
in favour of change if it was detrimental to patients and other
services. Unfortunately it appears that under the STP this is clearly
the case.
Therefore I urge you, on behalf of my
late father, do not allow the betrayal of thousands of Southend people
who raised millions of pounds for their local Hospital and Stroke Unit.
Do not 'sit on the fence' or allow yourself to be threatened by
arguments of 'lost funding', but instead do the 'right thing for the
good of Southend and its people' and refer all or even part of the STP
back to the Secretary of State for Health now before it is too late!
Wednesday, 3 October 2018
Tuesday, 2 October 2018
Milton campaign meeting
![]() |
| Carl, Stephen, Paul and Cheryl |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
There has been some ill considered comments from members of the local authority in respect of travellers. Fortunately none of the bad ...
-
Milton ward councillor Julian Ware-Lane had expressed concerns about the move of the High Street Post Office into the W H Smith sto...
-
PRESS RELEASE The pressure to save Leigh Post Office will be stepped up this week as part of the campaign to maintain a full post of...




